My complaint about Linky

Because of Linky's attitude, I usually don't respond to his expostulations, but this time I'll make an exception. Instead of focusing on why we must, in one voice, cry out that we will not tolerate Linky's drugged-out op-ed pieces, I would like to remind people that it is hardly surprising that posterity will have little occasion to glorify Linky's "heroic" existence in a new epic. I have avoided engaging in open debate with dishonest cretins -- or even acknowledging their existence -- for fear of lending them any form of legitimacy. The world has a surplus of stupidity. But it gets worse than that.

Before explaining why neo-nit-picky lousy scientists cause insurmountable trouble for us, I must first advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most stuck-up manifestations. Linky's spokesmen are cut from the same mold as insipid viperine slubberdegullions. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: Linky uses a rather spiteful definition of "disdenominationalize". None but the uninformed can deny that his arguments don't even prove his point.

Has Linky ever considered what would happen if a small fraction of his time spent trying to set the wolf to mind the sheep was instead spent on something productive? He can't help it; he just loves to condemn innocent people to death. It's quite sad that he chooses to squander his talent on this sort of imprudent larrikinism. In that context, one could say that people should just treat each other with decency and respect.

I challenge all of the materialistic tyrants out there to consider this: Linky's doctrines constitute one of the many conduits of Dadaism in our culture. It is important to realize that Linky's assistants argue, against a steady accretion of facts of already mountainous proportions, that we'd all be better off if they'd just combine, in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for lying. As far as Linky's logorrheic anecdotes are concerned, I will not capitulate today, tomorrow, or ever. As I have indicated, Linky is incapable of empathizing or identifying with others.

Linky, does the word "hydrometallurgically" mean anything to you? The significance of this is that you have my word that we must publicly distance ourselves from evil jokers. I think that it can be safely said that his lackeys assume that because they look a certain way or come from a certain background, they have a right to let temperamental heavy metal fans run rampant through the streets. I am troubled by Linky's constant exaggerations and half-truths. I respect Linky's actions, although malodorous absolutism and Linky's insinuations are one and the same.

The world has changed, Linky; get used to it. The irritating gnosticism I've been writing about is not primarily the fault of hate-filled sleazy vermin, nor of the pernicious sensualists who dismantle the family unit. It is the fault of Linky. In any case, it may seem excessive to note that his "sincerity" is as transparent as the icy, uncaring look in his eyes. Does he have trouble living with himself, knowing that favoritism, in this case, is a tactic tied to a broader strategy of granting Linky the ability to lower our standard of living? Mere association tends to lend credence to his rank-and-file followers, who are legion, because people assume they can't be that bad if a respected person is associated with them.

I, not being one of the many heinous flakes of this world, am highly critical of those who tolerate or apologize for people who work with Linky. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion. His subalterns have the audacity to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against his adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass, but given the way things are these days, we must remember that there is no justification on any level whatsoever for his supercilious hastily-mounted campaigns. It is painful to write such truisms, but this is yet to be comprehended by most batty pusillanimous authoritarians. Linky has a staggering number of disgraceful acolytes. One way to lower their numbers, if not eradicate them entirely, is simple. We just inform them that Linky's rapacious agendas may have serious repercussions, even beyond the issue of plagiarism.

He has endorsed the idea of surly stoicism in a number of specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of his foot soldiers' decision to control, manipulate, and harm other people. Since most people oppose his pretentious epigrams, Linky has had to leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries using every self-serving means imaginable. He approximates diabolic clergymen as far as practical action is concerned, but differs from them in psychology, ideology and motivation. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: The confusion that contemptible shiftless cult leaders create is desirable and convenient to our national enemies.

You might object to my claim that the same poisonous spirit that infects sullen morons also pollutes Linky's thinking. But bear in mind that Linky's maneuvers will cause more harm than good.

Most law-abiding citizens disapprove of Linky's methods. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Linky tried to grant avaricious reprobates the keys to the kingdom. You are, I'm sure, well aware that his allies have shared the rostrum with primitive apostate at recent symposia. But did you know that he simply regurgitates the empty arguments that have been fed to him over the years? This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because I suspect that the portrayal of numskulls in our culture is partially responsible for Linky's sound bites.

-- Dinky

Linky & Dinky's weekly reports from the Web are free for all -- educational, entertaining, and very low in sodium. Click Here to subscribe or tell a friend.

Copyright © 1998, Linky & Dinky. All rights reserved.